Related articles |
---|
[3 earlier articles] |
Re: PL/I nostalgia gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-04-24) |
Re: PL/I nostalgia robin51@dodo.com.au (robin) (2012-04-28) |
Re: PL/I nostalgia gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-04-28) |
Re: PL/I code robin51@dodo.com.au (robin) (2012-05-05) |
Re: PL/I code gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-05-05) |
Re: Fortran calls, was PL/I code gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-05-06) |
Re: Archaic hardware (was Fortran calls) robin51@dodo.com.au (robin) (2012-05-09) |
From: | "robin" <robin51@dodo.com.au> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Wed, 9 May 2012 10:46:17 +1000 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 12-04-070 12-04-077 12-04-081 12-04-082 12-04-084 12-04-085 12-05-004 12-05-005 12-05-006 |
Keywords: | history |
Posted-Date: | 10 May 2012 12:38:25 EDT |
From: "glen herrmannsfeldt" <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Sent: Sunday, 6 May 2012 3:13 PM
> I remembered the PDP-8 using the "store the return address in the
> first word" method, but, yes, there was an earlier PDP-10 compiler.
> The one I used was, I believe, called Fortran-10 and the older one
> Fortran-40.
The CDC machines 7600, Cyber 70 series, etc used that method to store
the return address.
Surprising that those machines should take a step backwards,
in view of around a decade of Algol (with recursion).
It meant that each subroutine/function needed to implement its own
stack should it be called recursively.
Alan Turing designed the push-down pop-up stack
for subroutines back in 1945, for his computer (later
christened Automatic Computing Engine).
That feature did not see hardware at that time.
However, the Pilot ACE (1951) included a push-down stack
(or, if you like) a queue. That push-down stack was
continued into the DEUCE line (1955).
The stack as a means of calling and returning from subroutines/
functions was implemented in the KDF9 (1961, delivered 1963).
The S/360 and subsequent issue stored the return address in a register.
That made it somewhat easier to have a universal stack manipulated
by software.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.