Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text?

compilers@is-not-my.name
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:12:48 -0000

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[40 earlier articles]
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-22)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? tk@ic.unicamp.br (Tomasz Kowaltowski) (2012-04-22)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB) (2012-04-22)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-22)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-04-22)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2012-04-23)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-23)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? basile@starynkevitch.net (2012-05-02)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? johann@2ndquadrant.com (Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson) (2012-06-06)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? sinu.nayak2001@gmail.com (Srinivas Nayak) (2012-06-16)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: compilers@is-not-my.name
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:12:48 -0000
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 12-04-054
Keywords: books
Posted-Date: 24 Apr 2012 12:07:50 EDT

"Joe Schmo" <askmeforit@nospam.myisp.com> wrote:


> The first few chapters of "Programming Language Pragmatics" by Michael Scott
> for a good and fast overview. (The rest of the book is quite good also if
> you are designing your own language).


Thanks.


> "Writing Compilers & Interpreter - An Applied Approach" by Ronald Mak.
> Creates a Pascal compiler in C which emits x86 assembly language.
> The Fischer and LeBlanc authored book is good for the implementation
> details. I.e., their particular take on an implementation anyway. It sticks
> in my mind that this is a very good book (but I somehow lost the mini review
> I made for myself about it) that I will obtain again in the future.


Thanks, I'll look for both of these. For now I will start with the IBM-based
books since they will be the easiest for me to understand. Thanks to
everyone for the suggestions.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.