Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text?

compiler.ddj@h-rd.org
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:07:28 +0200

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[15 earlier articles]
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? torbenm@diku.dk (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compiler.ddj@h-rd.org (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? arnold@skeeve.com (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-20)
[22 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: compiler.ddj@h-rd.org
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:07:28 +0200
Organization: Compilers Central
Keywords: books
Posted-Date: 19 Apr 2012 23:27:50 EDT

Hi,


my favorites list:


Best read, easy to understand and follow:
Compiler Construction - N. Wirth [PDF (597 KB)]
http://www.ethoberon.ethz.ch/WirthPubl/CBEAll.pdf




somwhat old, but good to read: Gries "Compiler Construction for
digital computers"


And probably the most refreshing one: the Lisp 1.5 manual , it has is
an interpreter and compiler in the appendix. (
http://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/LISP/book/LISP%201.5%20Programmers%20Manual.pdf/view
).


[Appendix B of the Lisp 1.5 manual (which I happen to have in
convenient 1969 paper form) does have a pseudocode interpreter, but
Appendix D about the compiler just describes how to use it, no
listings. And he wouldn't like the Lisp compiler anyway, since then
he'd have to learn LAP. Gries is a good thought, quite concrete and the
target machine is a thinly disguised S/360. -John]



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.