Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text?

"BartC" <bc@freeuk.com>
Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:43:00 +0100

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[14 earlier articles]
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? torbenm@diku.dk (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compiler.ddj@h-rd.org (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? compilers@is-not-my.name (2012-04-19)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? arnold@skeeve.com (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-04-20)
Re: Good practical language and OS agnostic text? bc@freeuk.com (BartC) (2012-04-20)
[23 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:43:00 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 12-04-019 12-04-026
Keywords: parse, design
Posted-Date: 19 Apr 2012 23:19:29 EDT

<compilers@is-not-my.name> wrote in message news:12-04-026@comp.compilers...
>> [Sorry to burst your bubble, but I knew people writing compilers for
>> DOS, and they understood parsing theory just fine. Although I agree


>I need a way to get started and I can't
> seem to understand the math I have seen so far and I have nobody to talk
> it over with so I really need something more practical.


You don't need any maths to get started. Perhaps that was to do with
parsing; just google for "recursive descent parsers", you might find some
examples that don't use a curly-brace language.


--
Bartc


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.