Related articles |
---|
C++ runtime profiling emailamit@gmail.com (Amit Gupta) (2007-06-22) |
Re: C++ runtime profiling dmaze@mit.edu (David Z Maze) (2007-06-25) |
Re: C++ runtime profiling rsc@swtch.com (Russ Cox) (2007-06-25) |
Re: C++ runtime profiling reganrussell@optusnet.com.au (regan) (2007-09-04) |
C++ runtime profiling mikedunlavey44@gmail.com (Michael Dunlavey) (2012-01-13) |
From: | Michael Dunlavey <mikedunlavey44@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:52:23 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Keywords: | C++, debug |
Posted-Date: | 14 Jan 2012 15:11:28 EST |
I think the best tool for performance tuning isn't a tool at all, it's
a technique - random pausing.
Here's a sourceforge project that walks through a specific example:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/randompausedemo/
Here is a list of objections to gprof and other profilers:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1777556/alternatives-to-gprof/1779343#1779343
Mike Dunlavey
Pharsight
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.