Related articles |
---|
How detect cycle in grammar ? a.moderacja@gmail.com (Borneq) (2011-11-20) |
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? haberg-news@telia.com (Hans Aberg) (2011-11-21) |
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? gene.ressler@gmail.com (Gene) (2011-11-21) |
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2011-11-22) |
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? a.moderacja@gmail.com (Borneq) (2011-11-23) |
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? a.moderacja@gmail.com (Borneq) (2011-11-24) |
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? quinn_jackson2004@yahoo.ca (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (2011-11-25) |
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? gene.ressler@gmail.com (Gene) (2011-11-27) |
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? gene.ressler@gmail.com (Gene) (2011-11-27) |
Re: How detect cycle in grammar ? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2011-11-28) |
[4 later articles] |
From: | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:20:06 GMT |
Organization: | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
References: | 11-11-041 11-11-045 |
Keywords: | parse, design |
Posted-Date: | 25 Nov 2011 22:13:09 EST |
Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> writes:
>Nonterminals that can never derive a terminal string are the
>problem.
Is it really? Since they cannot derive a terminal, they have no
influence on the language described by the grammar. They might just
as well not be there. Are they really a problem (except for certain
implementation techniques)?
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.