Related articles |
---|
Formally Defining a Programming Language seimarao@gmail.com (Seima Rao) (2011-11-19) |
Re: Formally Defining a Programming Language kaz@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2011-11-21) |
Re: Formally Defining a Programming Language christophe@taodyne.com (Christophe de Dinechin) (2011-11-22) |
Re: Formally Defining a Programming Language s_dubrovich@yahoo.com (s_dubrovich@yahoo.com) (2011-11-27) |
Re: Formally Defining a Programming Language federation2005@netzero.com (2012-02-29) |
Re: Formally Defining a Programming Language gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2012-03-02) |
From: | Seima Rao <seimarao@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:15:53 +0530 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Keywords: | theory, question |
Posted-Date: | 21 Nov 2011 11:06:58 EST |
Hi,
n designing my own Programming Language and given the existence
of a lot of programming languages and an infinity of "knowhows" that
is the Internet, I resorted to adhoc adaptation methods that worked
incredibly well!
However, now, I want to formalize the definition of my programming
language. I find that the Backus Naur Form is a notation but reaching
to that form requires decisions such as the following illustration
would suggest:
Illustration of Correct C++
-----------------------------------
function_declaration:
function_specifier return_type
fct_declarator '(' param_decl ')
cv_qualifier exception_specification ';'
;
In this illustration, I am inclined to ask:
i) What is it that contributes to deciding that
'inline' should be a separate "specifier"
in the grammar?
ii) How did the designers come up with
something called a "specifier"?
iii) What is a "specifier" in a non-C/C++ context
by the way?
Therefore, I suspect that there is a Formal Study of Programming
Languages that occurs in Selected Schools.
Can readers of this forum help direct to relevant materials wrt
Formalism that I can study to learn about Formalisms that will help in
deciding about my Programming Language?
Sincerely,
Seima Rao.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.