Related articles |
---|
[11 earlier articles] |
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions kaz@kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2011-11-03) |
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2011-11-03) |
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2011-11-04) |
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2011-11-04) |
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2011-11-04) |
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions amker.cheng@gmail.com (amker) (2011-11-07) |
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions chenwj@cs.NCTU.edu.tw (Wei-Jen Chen) (2011-11-10) |
Re: How to eliminate redundant constant move instructions gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2011-11-10) |
From: | Wei-Jen Chen <chenwj@cs.NCTU.edu.tw> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:04:46 +0000 (UTC) |
Organization: | College of Computer Science, National Chiao Tung University |
References: | 11-10-019 11-11-004 11-11-009 11-11-025 11-11-030 |
Keywords: | optimize, linker |
Posted-Date: | 11 Nov 2011 02:19:06 EST |
> Unfortunately, cse only works on basis of extended basic block.
> Nothing it can do for global cases as reported in mentioned bug.
Can LTO help?
Regards,
chenwj
[That's gcc's link time optimizer -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.