Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Language Design 81282ed9a88799d21e77957df2d84bd6514d9af6@myhashism (Billy Mays) (2011-07-18) |
| Re: Language Design usenet@rwaltman.com (Roberto Waltman) (2011-07-18) |
| Re: Language Design sinu.nayak2001@gmail.com (Srinivas Nayak) (2011-07-18) |
| Re: Language Design anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2011-07-19) |
| Re: Language Design zwinkau@kit.edu (Andreas Zwinkau) (2011-07-20) |
| Re: Language Design acolvin@efunct.com (mac) (2011-07-23) |
| Re: Language Design christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com (Christophe de Dinechin) (2011-07-23) |
| Re: Language Design osesov@gmail.com (Oleg Sesov) (2011-07-23) |
| Re: Language Design gene.ressler@gmail.com (Gene) (2011-07-26) |
| Re: Language Design thomas.mertes@gmx.at (tm) (2011-07-27) |
| Re: Language Design usenet@rwaltman.com (Roberto Waltman) (2011-07-28) |
| Re: Language Design s_dubrovich@yahoo.com (s_dubrovich@yahoo.com) (2011-08-04) |
| [2 later articles] |
| From: | mac <acolvin@efunct.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:11:48 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization: | A noiseless patient Spider |
| References: | 11-07-027 |
| Keywords: | history, design |
| Posted-Date: | 23 Jul 2011 02:42:01 EDT |
> I'd rather not just re implement C or other commonly used languages, but
> I'm having a hard time coming up with something I'd actually want to use.
XPL?
It was populsr in the 16-bit days
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.