Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile?

Steven Shaw <steshaw@gmail.com>
Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:06:29 -0800 (PST)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[9 earlier articles]
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? nospam@myisp.net (Tony) (2011-01-19)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB) (2011-01-19)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB) (2011-01-22)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? ehog.hedge@googlemail.com (chris dollin) (2011-01-22)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? nospam@myisp.net (Tony) (2011-01-22)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? bc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2011-01-23)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? steshaw@gmail.com (Steven Shaw) (2011-01-24)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? steshaw@gmail.com (Steven Shaw) (2011-01-24)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? barry.j.kelly@gmail.com (Barry Kelly) (2011-01-24)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? nospam@myisp.net (Tony) (2011-01-24)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? thomas.mertes@gmx.at (tm) (2011-01-24)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? eh@electrichedgehog.net (Chris Dollin) (2011-01-26)
Re: Intermediate forms (again?): worthwhile? bc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2011-01-26)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Steven Shaw <steshaw@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:06:29 -0800 (PST)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 11-01-089
Keywords: LLVM
Posted-Date: 26 Jan 2011 12:14:30 EST

I think you misunderstand the scope of LLVM. It has a textual representation (aka "language") that resembles assembly.


http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html


You don't have to generate binary version of that yourself.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.