Related articles |
---|
[6 earlier articles] |
Re: Looking for a real Fortran-66 compatible PC compiler (CP/M or DOS kargls@comcast.net (steve) (2010-12-31) |
Re: language design implications for variant records in a pascal-like gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2011-01-02) |
Re: Looking for a real Fortran-66 compatible PC compiler (CP/M or DOS gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2011-01-02) |
Re: Looking for a real Fortran-66 compatible PC compiler (CP/M or DOS gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2011-01-03) |
Re: language design implications for variant records in a pascal-like bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2011-01-06) |
Re: language design implications for variant records in a pascal-like robin51@dodo.com.au (robin) (2011-01-10) |
Re: Looking for a real Fortran-66 compatible PC compiler (CP/M or DOS robin51@dodo.com.au (robin) (2011-01-13) |
From: | "robin" <robin51@dodo.com.au> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:12:21 +1100 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 10-12-040 10-12-043 11-01-005 11-01-009 11-01-027 11-01-030 |
Keywords: | Fortran, history |
Posted-Date: | 13 Jan 2011 00:11:37 EST |
"Peter Dassow" <z80eu@arcor.de> wrote in message news:10-12-047@comp.compilers...
| I have to compile some very old Fortran-66 programs,
| Are there any other PC compatible Fortran-66 compilers
| out there ?
You are likely to have much more success with a modern compuiler,
such as F90 or F95, which will probably have many of the
F66 extensions as standard features.
As well as that, some compilers still support old features.
Try the Silverfrost Fortran 95 compiler, which is one such
compiler.
As well as that, I think that you can still obtain their F77 compiler.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.