Re: C 16 bit compiler

"Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org>
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:45:03 +0200

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
C 16 bit compiler ilikequoting@katamail.com (Jack Smith) (2010-09-27)
Re: C 16 bit compiler efutch@gmail.com (Egdares Futch) (2010-09-28)
Re: C 16 bit compiler nmh@t3x.org (Nils M Holm) (2010-09-29)
Re: C 16 bit compiler cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2010-09-28)
Re: C 16 bit compiler gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2010-09-29)
Re: C 16 bit compiler ArarghMail009@Arargh.com (2010-09-30)
Re: C 16 bit compiler ilikequoting@katamail.com (Jack Smith) (2010-10-01)
Re: C 16 bit compiler gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2010-10-01)
Re: C 16 bit compiler gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2010-10-03)
[3 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Nils M Holm" <nmh@t3x.org>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:45:03 +0200
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 10-09-027
Keywords: C
Posted-Date: 29 Sep 2010 23:26:58 EDT

Jack Smith <ilikequoting@katamail.com> wrote:
> The more general question,
> suppose you have to write a bootloader (only stage1) in C and in real
> mode, what compiler will you use?


I would probably use TurboC (TCC) 2.x or Bruce's C compiler (BCC).
TCC is, of course, commercial, but as far as I know it has been made
freely available at some time. BCC is free software.


--
Nils M Holm | http://t3x.org


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.