Re: PL/I, was How to implement lexical closures?

Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net>
Mon, 17 May 2010 14:45:31 -0700

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
How to implement lexical closures? grom358@gmail.com (grom) (2010-05-06)
Re: How to implement lexical closures? gene.ressler@gmail.com (Gene) (2010-05-12)
Re: How to implement lexical closures? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2010-05-13)
Re: How to implement lexical closures? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2010-05-15)
Re: How to implement lexical closures? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2010-05-15)
Re: How to implement lexical closures? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2010-05-16)
Re: How to implement lexical closures? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2010-05-17)
Re: PL/I, was How to implement lexical closures? genew@ocis.net (Gene Wirchenko) (2010-05-17)
Re: PL/I, was How to implement lexical closures? alex.colvin@valley.net (mac) (2010-05-25)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:45:31 -0700
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 10-05-031 10-05-072 10-05-076 10-05-084 10-05-089 10-05-091 10-05-099
Keywords: PL/I, history
Posted-Date: 19 May 2010 00:52:21 EDT

On Mon, 17 May 2010 00:54:03 -0400, George Neuner
<gneuner2@comcast.net> wrote:


[snip]


>[That sounds right, but it depends on the version of PL/I. I have
>the impenetrable 1976 PL/I standard and don't see anything about
>threads. -John]


          IIRC, the PL/I term was "task".


Sincerely,


Gene Wirchenko
[Yes, and not surprisingly that was the OS/360 term, too. You used
an ATTACH rather than CALL statement. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.