Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues

Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee.org>
Sun, 09 May 2010 17:09:42 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Writing a C Compiler: lvalues andre.nho@gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Wagner?=) (2010-05-08)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk (Ben Bacarisse) (2010-05-09)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues bartc@freeuk.com (bart.c) (2010-05-09)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues tom@iahu.ca (Tom St Denis) (2010-05-09)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues kst-u@mib.org (Keith Thompson) (2010-05-09)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues esosman@ieee.org (Eric Sosman) (2010-05-09)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues stargazer3p14@gmail.com (Stargazer) (2010-05-10)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues marc@lithia.nl (Marc van Lieshout) (2010-05-16)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues esosman@ieee.org (Eric Sosman) (2010-05-17)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues kst-u@mib.org (Keith Thompson) (2010-05-17)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues kst-u@mib.org (Keith Thompson) (2010-05-19)
Re: Writing a C Compiler: lvalues bartc@freeuk.com (bart.c) (2010-05-19)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.compilers
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 17:09:42 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 10-05-036 10-05-041
Keywords: C, code
Posted-Date: 09 May 2010 17:29:53 EDT

On 5/9/2010 1:25 PM, Tom St Denis wrote:
>
> ++ requires an object that an address can be taken of attached to
> either the right or left which forms part of a larger expression.


          Yes to "object," no to "address can be taken." Examples:


register int obj1 = 42;
struct { int obj2 : 7; } s = { 42 };
++obj1; // okay
s.obj2++; // okay
&obj1; // constraint violation
&s.obj2; // constraint violation


--
Eric Sosman


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.