Re: How to implement dynamic typing?

"BGB / cr88192" <cr88192@hotmail.com>
Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:51:31 -0700

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[8 earlier articles]
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? torbenm@diku.dk (2010-04-07)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? ctalk@ctalklang.org (Ctalk Project) (2010-04-07)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2010-04-07)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2010-04-10)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? bartc@freeuk.com (bartc) (2010-04-11)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? harold.aptroot@gmail.com (Harold Aptroot) (2010-04-11)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2010-04-11)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2010-04-12)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2010-04-13)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? bartc@freeuk.com (bartc) (2010-04-14)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2010-04-14)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2010-04-16)
Re: How to implement dynamic typing? gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2010-04-18)
[10 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: "BGB / cr88192" <cr88192@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:51:31 -0700
Organization: albasani.net
References: 10-04-009 10-04-028 10-04-032
Keywords: types
Posted-Date: 12 Apr 2010 11:59:19 EDT

"Harold Aptroot" <harold.aptroot@gmail.com> wrote in message
> "BGB / cr88192" <cr88192@hotmail.com> wrote in message




>> C++: if(dynamic_cast<Foo>(obj)) ...
>> Java: if(obj instanceof Foo) ...
>> C#: if(typeof(Foo).IsInstanceOf(obj)) ...
>
> How about: if (obj is Foo) for C#?


I didn't know about this when I wrote this message...
but, yes, this is a better notation...


I am not exactly well experienced in C#, FWIW.




actually, at first I didn't even know this, so I was left using casts and
catching the exception, but figured there had to be a better way than this
(I didn't believe MS would botch up this bad). after a lot of fiddling, I
figured out the "typeof" notation, and it worked.


"is" seems better though.



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.