Related articles |
---|
Fat references jon@ffconsultancy.com (Jon Harrop) (2009-12-29) |
Re: Fat references paul.biggar@gmail.com (Paul Biggar) (2009-12-30) |
Re: Fat references bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2009-12-30) |
Re: Fat references cr88192@hotmail.com (BGB / cr88192) (2009-12-30) |
Re: Fat references gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2009-12-30) |
Re: Fat references jon@ffconsultancy.com (Jon Harrop) (2009-12-30) |
Re: Fat references kkylheku@gmail.com (Kaz Kylheku) (2009-12-30) |
[29 later articles] |
From: | Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:55:59 +0000 |
Organization: | Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. |
Keywords: | code, GC |
Posted-Date: | 30 Dec 2009 02:05:12 EST |
I've been working on a project called HLVM in my spare time:
http://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/hlvm
One goal was to have fast interop with C, so I didn't want to copy the
traditional style of placing a header with GC metadata before every value
in the heap because that would require C arrays to be copied just to add
this header. I couldn't be bothered to allocate a separate header so,
instead, I pulled the GC metadata into the reference. So my references are
now "fat": a quadword of pointer to run-time type, array length or union
type tag, pointer to mark state and pointer to the actual data itself.
This actually works rather well except I sacrificed atomic read/write of
references. Has it been done before?
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?u
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.