Re: Switch statement code generation

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:52:58 +0100

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: Switch statement code generation Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid (Joshua Cranmer) (2009-11-04)
Re: Switch statement code generation walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2009-11-05)
Re: Switch statement code generation bartc@freeuk.com (bartc) (2009-11-05)
Re: Switch statement code generation nathan.mccauley@gmail.com (nathan.mccauley@gmail.com) (2009-11-07)
Re: Switch statement code generation DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2009-11-08)
Re: Switch statement code generation bear@sonic.net (Ray) (2009-11-09)
Re: Switch statement code generation DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2009-11-11)
Re: Switch statement code generation derek@knosof.co.uk (Derek M. Jones) (2009-11-11)
Re: Switch statement code generation anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2009-11-11)
Re: Switch statement code generation idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira Baxter) (2009-11-14)
Re: Switch statement code generation cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2009-11-15)
Re: Switch statement code generation pertti.kellomaki@tut.fi (Pertti Kellomaki) (2009-11-16)
Re: Switch statement code generation haberg_20080406@math.su.se (Hans Aberg) (2009-11-17)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:52:58 +0100
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 09-11-002 09-11-014 09-11-023 09-11-027
Keywords: code
Posted-Date: 13 Nov 2009 00:48:29 EST

Hans-Peter Diettrich schrieb:


> A string tree might give the best lookup performance.


> [If there's a lot of strings, a patricia trie might be faster than
> hashing or binary search since it doesn't require repeated scans of
> the string during the match process. -John]


Thanks for the "patricia trie" term :-)
Wikipedia redirects it to "Radix tree".


This is what I meant with "string tree".


DoDi


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.