Related articles |
---|
Comparisons and Benchmarking herron.philip@googlemail.com (Philip Herron) (2009-10-14) |
Re: Comparisons and Benchmarking DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2009-10-19) |
Re: Comparisons and Benchmarking SidTouati@inria.fr (Sid Touati) (2009-10-19) |
Re: Comparisons and Benchmarking anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2009-10-19) |
Re: Comparisons and Benchmarking paul.biggar@gmail.com (Paul Biggar) (2009-10-20) |
Re: Comparisons and Benchmarking igouy2@yahoo.com (Isaac Gouy) (2009-10-20) |
Re: Comparisons and Benchmarking tc@cs.bath.ac.uk (Tom Crick) (2009-10-20) |
Re: Comparisons and Benchmarking herron.philip@googlemail.com (Philip Herron) (2009-10-21) |
Re: Comparisons and Benchmarking torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2009-10-21) |
[3 later articles] |
From: | Sid Touati <SidTouati@inria.fr> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:21:09 +0200 |
Organization: | INRIA - CR Paris-Rocquencourt |
References: | 09-10-016 |
Keywords: | benchmarks |
Posted-Date: | 19 Oct 2009 21:14:15 EDT |
Comparing between programming languages is like comparing between
natural human languages: it is a complex mixture of culture, history,
economical power, trading protocols, and so on.
If you are forced to provide a quantitative comparison between two
languages, you will highly be in troubles !
- measure expressiveness of a language: depends on the application domain
- measure the performance of the code: depends on the compiler, on the
machine, on the code (implementation) and on the experimental protocol
- measure the popularity: depends on the users (on their educational level)
- measure the profitability: how much do we gain if we go from my actual
language to your language - how much we loose ?
- measure the simplicity: what are the tools that are developed for the
language, what is the education level needed for using your language, etc.
- portability : what can I do with my all previous codes ?
And so on.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.