Related articles |
---|
earley parser completion (newbie question) marc.daya@gmail.com (sinistral) (2009-10-11) |
Re: earley parser completion (newbie question) cdodd@acm.org (Chris Dodd) (2009-10-11) |
From: | sinistral <marc.daya@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:48:32 -0700 (PDT) |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Keywords: | parse, question |
Posted-Date: | 11 Oct 2009 14:37:21 EDT |
Greetings
I've been trying to understand the workings of the Earley algorithm
and I'm having trouble with the example presented on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earley_parser
What I don't understand in this example is why state set S(3) doesn't
include the state
S -> M dot # complete from S(0)(3)
Since we have a completion for the non-terminal M, wouldn't this be a
valid completion?
Any pointers as to what I'm missing would be greatly appreciated.
.marc
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.