Related articles |
---|
[3 earlier articles] |
Re: Online compiler courses? ott@mirix.org (Matthias-Christian Ott) (2009-08-30) |
Re: Online compiler courses? jkj2000@gmail.com (Steve H) (2009-08-30) |
Re: Online compiler courses? torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2009-08-31) |
Online compiler courses? paul.biggar@gmail.com (Paul Biggar) (2009-08-31) |
Online compiler courses? inderaj@gmail.com (Inderaj Bains) (2009-08-31) |
Re: Online compiler courses? paul.biggar@gmail.com (Paul Biggar) (2009-08-31) |
Re: Online compiler courses? bcb@undisclosedlocation.net (Bruce C. Baker) (2009-08-31) |
Re: Online compiler courses? sh006d3592@blueyonder.co.uk (Stephen Horne) (2009-09-01) |
Re: Online compiler courses? haberg_20080406@math.su.se (Hans Aberg) (2009-09-02) |
Re: Online compiler courses? herron.philip@googlemail.com (Philip Herron) (2009-09-02) |
Re: Online compiler courses? kamalpr@gmail.com (kamal) (2009-09-07) |
From: | "Bruce C. Baker" <bcb@undisclosedlocation.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:06:09 -0500 |
Organization: | Dis- |
References: | 09-08-046 09-08-048 09-08-054 |
Keywords: | courses |
Posted-Date: | 01 Sep 2009 23:37:58 EDT |
"Steve H" <jkj2000@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> If you've been at this long enough to know all about DFAs, CFGs and so
>> on, then you're ready to do what people who wanted to learn something
>> did before they even had the option of going online: Get a book.
>
> Hi Louis,
>
> I've also been going through books at the library, trying to find a
> good compiler text. It's frustrating. The dragon book is considered
> the canonical work, but it's quite meaty and difficult for self
> study. I believe that's the general consensus.
> As to other texts, I'm looking at Andrew Appel's book, and it's ok,
> but I think this kind of course is best suited for classroom
> sessions instead of self study, with lots of assignments to help the
> pedagogy. Just my opinion of course but writing a compiler I think
> takes a lot of hands on work, like engine building-- something
> that's best done by doing instead of reading through a Chilton or
> Haynes manual.
> It also doesn't help that a number of compiler texts are over ten
> years old and focus on C development instead of java. Again, I have
> nothing but respect for the C programming language but I'm more
> experienced with Java and would prefer to use that if at all
> possible.
The most useful compiler book I've encountered is the original 1993
edition of David A Watt's "Programming Language Processors: Compilers
and Interpreters", ISBN 013720129X. It's almost 20 years old and uses
an ancient Pascal compiler as its implementation language, but it does
a great job of explaining the nuts and bolts of a working processor.
If you absolutely, positively MUST program in Java, there's a more
recent edition (which I haven't seen), ISBN 0130257869.
Both books are available from Amazon.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.