Related articles |
---|
Dataflow and function calls tetra2005@googlemail.com (Yuri Gribov) (2009-07-23) |
Re: Dataflow and function calls gopi.onthemove@gmail.com (gopi) (2009-07-28) |
Re: Dataflow and function calls tetra2005@googlemail.com (Yuri Gribov) (2009-07-29) |
Re: Dataflow and function calls kamalpr@gmail.com (kamal) (2009-08-01) |
From: | Yuri Gribov <tetra2005@googlemail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:17:45 +0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 09-07-084 09-07-106 |
Keywords: | analysis, optimize |
Posted-Date: | 29 Jul 2009 22:59:35 EDT |
Thank you for your answer but please note that I was not asking about
alias analysis.
My problem is not finding out what variables may be changed by call
(or by some ambigous command) but how to incorporate this information
into dataflow framework. We have 2 main opportunities: consider that
call kills reaching definitions or that it does not. Both lead to
problems during optimization (see my first message).
Up to now I have found only one online course which mentions this
problem - Rajiv Gupta's Compiler Construction (see slide 7 in
http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~gupta/teaching/201-09/My3.pdf ). Unfortunately
it does not give any details.
--
s UWAVENIEM,
`RIJ
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.