Related articles |
---|
[2 earlier articles] |
Re: Static Garbage Collection gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2009-05-25) |
Re: Static Garbage Collection torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2009-05-26) |
Re: Static Garbage Collection mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2009-05-26) |
Re: Static Garbage Collection stock@esa.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Florian Stock) (2009-05-26) |
Re: Static Garbage Collection ott@mirix.org (Matthias-Christian Ott) (2009-05-26) |
Re: Static Garbage Collection vincent@famillebelliard.fr (Vincent Belliard) (2009-05-26) |
Re: Static Garbage Collection DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2009-05-29) |
Re: Static Garbage Collection armelasselin@hotmail.com (Armel) (2009-05-29) |
Re: Static Garbage Collection marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2009-05-30) |
Re: Static Garbage Collection vincent@famillebelliard.fr (Vincent Belliard) (2009-05-31) |
Re: Static Garbage Collection armelasselin@hotmail.com (Armel) (2009-06-01) |
From: | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Fri, 29 May 2009 07:43:37 +0200 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 09-05-120 09-05-129 |
Keywords: | storage, theory |
Posted-Date: | 31 May 2009 11:43:25 EDT |
Matthias-Christian Ott schrieb:
>> [This feels like it's equivalent to the halting problem which is known to
>> be insoluble in the general case, albeit often soluble in specific
>> instances. -John]
>
> So you claim that the life-time of some objects cannot be determined
> statically at compile-time.
Consider an BASIC (or any other) interpreter. When your language allows
to write such interpreters, the runtime behaviour depends only on the
input (code to interpret), not on the interpreter. When your language
doesn't allow for that class of applications, what other meaningful
applications would it support at all?
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.