Re: Lexer, Parser, AST, what now?

"Aaron Gray" <ang.usenet@gmail.com>
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:12:33 -0000

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Lexer, Parser, AST, what now? licaner@gmail.com (lican) (2009-03-10)
Re: Lexer, Parser, AST, what now? ang.usenet@gmail.com (2009-03-15)
Re: Lexer, Parser, AST, what now? licaner@gmail.com (lican) (2009-03-17)
Re: Lexer, Parser, AST, what now? ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2009-03-18)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Aaron Gray" <ang.usenet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:12:33 -0000
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 09-03-047 09-03-074 09-03-082
Keywords: AST, LLVM
Posted-Date: 18 Mar 2009 21:35:53 EDT

"lican" <licaner@gmail.com> wrote in message
> Since I'm trying to generate dynamic language bytecode for my VM LLVM
> will not do me any good. I managed to generate CFG and basic blocks


PyPy runs on LLVM, admittedly not very efficiently at present :-


        http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/


See down the page a bit under status


Also :-


        http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/#pypy


Aaron


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.