Re: VM as target, was Is Assembler Language essential

George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net>
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:38:42 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[10 earlier articles]
Re: VM as target, was Is Assembler Language essential cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-02-25)
Re: VM as target, was Is Assembler Language essential gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2009-02-25)
Re: VM as target, was Is Assembler Language essential cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-02-27)
Re: VM as target, was Is Assembler Language essential gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2009-02-28)
Re: VM as target, was Is Assembler Language essential cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-03-01)
Re: VM as target, was Is Assembler Language essential gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2009-03-02)
Re: VM as target, was Is Assembler Language essential gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2009-03-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:38:42 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: 09-02-021 09-02-037 09-02-076 09-02-082 09-02-089 09-02-095 09-02-103 09-02-109 09-02-114 09-02-122 09-02-124 09-02-133 09-02-143 09-02-151 09-03-007 09-03-015
Keywords: GC, parallel
Posted-Date: 05 Mar 2009 05:57:35 EST

On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:48:37 -0500, George Neuner
<gneuner2@comcast.net> wrote:


>You can't live completely without barriers unless [1] you stop the
>world or [2] there is no shared memory.


Wrote this too late at night :)


Shared memory is irrelevant ... you can't live without barriers unless
you stop the world.


George


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.