Related articles |
---|
Compiler Tool with Error Recovery jmensch@shaw.ca (Julian Mensch) (2009-02-12) |
Re: Compiler Tool with Error Recovery m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (2009-02-14) |
Re: Compiler Tool with Error Recovery vmakarov@redhat.com (Vladimir Makarov) (2009-02-17) |
Re: Compiler Tool with Error Recovery jaluber@gmail.com (Johannes) (2009-02-19) |
Re: Compiler Tool with Error Recovery jmensch@shaw.ca (Julian Mensch) (2009-02-21) |
Re: Compiler Tool with Error Recovery llib-xoc@sbcglobal.net (Bill Cox) (2009-02-25) |
From: | Bill Cox <llib-xoc@sbcglobal.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:31:59 -0800 |
Organization: | at&t http://my.att.net/ |
References: | 09-02-046 |
Keywords: | tools, errors |
Posted-Date: | 26 Feb 2009 20:12:14 EST |
> I'd love to hear any suggestions for parsers that meet these
> criteria -- something like Elkhound, except with error recovery,
> would be great.
>
I recommend ANTLR which is actively mained by Terrence Parr, and
has a very active support group on the mailing list. Go to antlr.org.
There's also a great book The Complete Guide to ANTLR by Prof Parr.
It generates LL(*) parsers, with control over backtracking, which
gives it great expressive power, but less than GLR.
Bill
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.