Related articles |
---|
[4 earlier articles] |
Re: Run-time representation of classes ftu@fi.uu.nl (2009-01-31) |
Re: Run-time representation of classes michael@schuerig.de (Michael Schuerig) (2009-02-02) |
Re: Run-time representation of classes cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-02-03) |
Re: Run-time representation of classes gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2009-02-04) |
Re: Run-time representation of classes michael@schuerig.de (Michael Schuerig) (2009-02-05) |
Re: Run-time representation of classes cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-02-05) |
Re: Run-time representation of classes cppljevans@suddenlink.net (Larry Evans) (2009-02-07) |
Re: Run-time representation of classes cr88192@hotmail.com (cr88192) (2009-02-08) |
Re: Run-time representation of classes gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2009-02-08) |
From: | Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:24:56 -0600 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 09-01-055 09-02-001 09-02-007 09-02-010 09-02-011 |
Keywords: | OOP, storage |
Posted-Date: | 07 Feb 2009 12:57:17 EST |
On 02/04/09 19:19, Michael Schuerig wrote:
[snip]
> What I didn't see in the books I mentioned is a description of
> pointer/reference maps for precise GC. The terms aren't even in the
> indexes.
[snip]
There's no data structure description, but there is mention of a
static "reference containing map" on p. 267 (chapter 10) of
Jones/Lins. That paragraph mentions [Detlefs,1992]:
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.37.9897
The Detlef reference maps are per class and don't describe a map for
the stack or static area. Nor do the maps handle pointers to vectors,
AFAICT. There was a working example of such a map that handled vectors
or any kind of stl like container; however, it's no longer being
developed:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/dxlzck
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.