Re: Source-to-Source compilers?

Simone Pellegrini <motonacciu@gmail.com>
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:04:20 -0800 (PST)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Source-to-Source compilers? motonacciu@gmail.com (Simone Pellegrini) (2009-01-16)
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2009-01-17)
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? idbaxter@semdesigns.com (2009-01-16)
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? rnsanchez@wait4.org (Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez) (2009-01-18)
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? motonacciu@gmail.com (Simone Pellegrini) (2009-01-19)
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? motonacciu@gmail.com (Simone Pellegrini) (2009-01-19)
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? motonacciu@gmail.com (Simone Pellegrini) (2009-01-19)
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? serge.guelton@irisa.fr (serge guelton) (2009-01-20)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Simone Pellegrini <motonacciu@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:04:20 -0800 (PST)
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 09-01-043
Keywords: tools
Posted-Date: 19 Jan 2009 07:20:01 EST

On Jan 18, 10:36 am, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanc...@wait4.org>
wrote:
> How about Cetus?
>
> http://cetus.ecn.purdue.edu


Hi, I know Cetus... and we don't like it! :)
first of all is written in Java... but ok we can close on eye about
that... but the other problem is that it works only with C programs...
no support for Fortran or C++ and that's bad!


All the benchmarks we are interested to optimize (SPEC MPI / Nas
Benchs) are mainly written in Fortran!


thanks, bye


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.