Related articles |
---|
Source-to-Source compilers? motonacciu@gmail.com (Simone Pellegrini) (2009-01-16) |
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2009-01-17) |
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? idbaxter@semdesigns.com (2009-01-16) |
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? rnsanchez@wait4.org (Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez) (2009-01-18) |
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? motonacciu@gmail.com (Simone Pellegrini) (2009-01-19) |
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? motonacciu@gmail.com (Simone Pellegrini) (2009-01-19) |
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? motonacciu@gmail.com (Simone Pellegrini) (2009-01-19) |
Re: Source-to-Source compilers? serge.guelton@irisa.fr (serge guelton) (2009-01-20) |
From: | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:01:10 +0100 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 09-01-039 |
Keywords: | parallel, tools |
Posted-Date: | 18 Jan 2009 08:05:20 EST |
Simone Pellegrini schrieb:
> I am working in the optimization of parallel applications for multi-
> core architectures. We don't want to auto-parallelize code but take a
> parallel application (mainly written in C/C++ or Fortran) and produce
> the optimized version via application of transformations.
I.e. you want parallelization at compile time, not at runtime?
> Now most of these transformation should be done at source level, so
> our need is for something able to do source-to-source compilation. As
> now, the only tools that fulfill our requirements are 2.
IMO the transformation should be integrated into the single compilation
pass, based on the AST. An (intermediate) source file could be provided
for debugging, but is not required for the generation of executable code.
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.