Re: Overloaded logic operators

Louis Krupp <lkrupp@pssw.com>
Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:34:14 -0700

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Overloaded logic operators torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2008-11-24)
Re: Overloaded logic operators bc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2008-11-24)
Re: Overloaded logic operators arnold@skeeve.com (2008-11-25)
Re: Overloaded logic operators mike@mike-austin.com (Mike Austin) (2008-11-25)
Re: Overloaded logic operators mike@mike-austin.com (Mike Austin) (2008-11-25)
Re: Overloaded logic operators mike@mike-austin.com (Mike Austin) (2008-11-25)
Re: Overloaded logic operators lkrupp@pssw.com (Louis Krupp) (2008-11-25)
Re: Overloaded logic operators mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2008-11-25)
Re: Overloaded logic operators m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (2008-11-25)
Re: Overloaded logic operators bc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2008-11-25)
Re: Overloaded logic operators cdodd@acm.org (Chris Dodd) (2008-11-25)
Re: Overloaded logic operators torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2008-11-26)
Re: Overloaded logic operators fswarbrick@gmail.com (Frank Swarbrick) (2008-11-27)
[3 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Louis Krupp <lkrupp@pssw.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:34:14 -0700
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-11-110 08-11-114
Keywords: Cobol, history, comment
Posted-Date: 25 Nov 2008 07:08:28 EST

<snip>
> [The A < B < C syntax has been part of Cobol for many decades. It seems
> to work fine there. -John]


Are you sure that's in COBOL? It doesn't sound familiar, and I don't
have a COBOL manual handy.


Louis
[Actually, it's in verbose Cobolese:


  IF B IS GREATER THAN A AND LESS THAN C ...


or


  IF B > A AND < C ...


-John]

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.