Related articles |
---|
Flex and Lex interpreting regex differently mjmjenks@gmail.com (2008-10-13) |
Re: Flex and Lex interpreting regex differently jdenny@ces.clemson.edu (Joel E. Denny) (2008-10-13) |
Re: Flex and Lex interpreting regex differently mjmjenks@gmail.com (2008-10-13) |
From: | mjmjenks@gmail.com |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:32:39 -0700 (PDT) |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 08-10-018 08-10-019 |
Keywords: | lex |
Posted-Date: | 14 Oct 2008 06:30:27 EDT |
On Oct 13, 11:36 am, "Joel E. Denny" <jde...@ces.clemson.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 mjmje...@gmail.com wrote:
> The difference is whether that "?" after the "{ScaleFactor}" applies to
> the "{digit}+" at the end of "{ScaleFactor}" or to all of "{ScaleFactor}".
Yes, this was the problem. I suppose I just assumed that lex would
automatically add parentheses to regular definitions. (The syntax
does seem to suggest it though...)
Thanks
[I think it's a bug. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.