Related articles |
---|
TXL ANTLR anders43@gmail.com (Anders Karlsson) (2008-08-28) |
Re: TXL ANTLR Jatin_Bhateja@mentor.com (Jatin Bhateja) (2008-08-29) |
Re: TXL ANTLR jaluber@gmail.com (Johannes) (2008-08-30) |
Re: TXL ANTLR parrt@cs.usfca.edu (Terence Parr) (2008-08-30) |
Re: TXL ANTLR anders43@gmail.com (ajk) (2008-09-01) |
Re: TXL ANTLR idbaxter@semdesigns.com (2008-09-23) |
From: | Johannes <jaluber@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:25:42 -0700 (PDT) |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 08-08-088 08-08-095 |
Keywords: | tools, PCCTS |
Posted-Date: | 30 Aug 2008 16:36:07 EDT |
On Aug 29, 8:55 am, Jatin Bhateja <Jatin_Bhat...@mentor.com> wrote:
> TXL and ANTLR both have following common features
>
> * Both are LL(k) parser generators.
That's not quite true. ANTLR is LL(*), meaning it can have an
infinitive lookahead similar to LR parsers. This is done via
generating DFAs for those situations. "The Definitive ANTLR Reference"
contains an in-depth explanation of this technique and is recommend if
you stay with ANTLR.
Johannes
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.