Related articles |
---|
Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets cartercheng@gmail.com (Carter Cheng) (2008-08-23) |
Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-08-24) |
Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets felipeangriman@gmail.com (Felipe Angriman) (2008-08-24) |
Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets cppljevans@suddenlink.net (Larry Evans) (2008-08-25) |
1:X in Choe's pdf (was Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k se cppljevans@suddenlink.net (Larry Evans) (2008-08-25) |
Re: 1:X in Choe's pdf (was Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow- cartercheng@gmail.com (Carter Cheng) (2008-08-25) |
Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets felipeangriman@gmail.com (Felipe Angriman) (2008-08-26) |
From: | Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:14:24 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 08-08-049 08-08-057 |
Keywords: | parse |
Posted-Date: | 25 Aug 2008 08:16:17 EDT |
On 08/24/08 15:08, Felipe Angriman wrote:
[snip]
> Kwang-Moo Choe, outlines an algorithm for computing First(k) Sets and
> Follow(k) Sets here:
>
> http://plus.kaist.ac.kr/~choe/cs522/cs522/pdf/5par-SLL(k).pdf
Page 1 of that pdf uses notation:
k:alpha beta
without defining what : means. My first guess is that it
takes the first k elements of an A^* if they exist; however,
that's not clear. Mr. Choe probably defines : in his
class room and say no need to repeat it on the .pdf.
>
> but I THINK that the algorithm does not work on left-recursive
> grammars (note: i haven't tried it)
Page 5 of that pdf says G (I guess a grammar)
is not LL(k) if G is left-recursive. so, I guess the
algorithm does not work on left-recursive grammars.
[snip]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.