Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets

Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net>
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:14:24 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets cartercheng@gmail.com (Carter Cheng) (2008-08-23)
Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-08-24)
Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets felipeangriman@gmail.com (Felipe Angriman) (2008-08-24)
Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets cppljevans@suddenlink.net (Larry Evans) (2008-08-25)
1:X in Choe's pdf (was Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k se cppljevans@suddenlink.net (Larry Evans) (2008-08-25)
Re: 1:X in Choe's pdf (was Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow- cartercheng@gmail.com (Carter Cheng) (2008-08-25)
Re: Algorithm for computing first-k follow-k sets felipeangriman@gmail.com (Felipe Angriman) (2008-08-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:14:24 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-08-049 08-08-057
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 25 Aug 2008 08:16:17 EDT

On 08/24/08 15:08, Felipe Angriman wrote:
[snip]
> Kwang-Moo Choe, outlines an algorithm for computing First(k) Sets and
> Follow(k) Sets here:
>
> http://plus.kaist.ac.kr/~choe/cs522/cs522/pdf/5par-SLL(k).pdf


Page 1 of that pdf uses notation:


      k:alpha beta


without defining what : means. My first guess is that it
takes the first k elements of an A^* if they exist; however,
that's not clear. Mr. Choe probably defines : in his
class room and say no need to repeat it on the .pdf.


>
> but I THINK that the algorithm does not work on left-recursive
> grammars (note: i haven't tried it)


Page 5 of that pdf says G (I guess a grammar)
is not LL(k) if G is left-recursive. so, I guess the
algorithm does not work on left-recursive grammars.


[snip]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.