Re: Number of compiler passes

Michiel <m.helvensteijn@gmail.com>
Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:00:08 +0200

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[7 earlier articles]
Re: Number of compiler passes m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (Michiel) (2008-07-26)
Re: Number of compiler passes gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-07-27)
Re: Number of compiler passes gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-07-28)
Re: Number of compiler passes gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-07-28)
Re: Number of compiler passes gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-07-29)
Re: Number of compiler passes gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-07-29)
Re: Number of compiler passes m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (Michiel) (2008-07-29)
Re: Number of compiler passes m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (Michiel) (2008-07-29)
Re: Number of compiler passes barry.kelly@codegear.com (Barry Kelly) (2008-07-30)
Re: Number of compiler passes gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-08-01)
Re: Number of compiler passes gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-08-03)
Re: Number of compiler passes gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-08-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Michiel <m.helvensteijn@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:00:08 +0200
Organization: Wanadoo
References: 08-07-041 08-07-044 08-07-048 08-07-058 08-07-059 08-07-068
Keywords: analysis, Fortran
Posted-Date: 01 Aug 2008 06:46:10 EDT

glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:


> I believe for Fortran INTENT(OUT) dummy variables, you must
> write first, but you can then read the value just as any other
> variable. They are not write-only.


I thought about this. But there is no (easy) way at compile time to figure
out if a variable has actually been written to. Think of this example:


int f(out int a) {
        if (rnd(0,10) > 5) {
                a <- 5;
        }
        result <- a; // is this allowed?
}


Note:
* rnd returns a random number
* <- is the assignment operator
* the language has no return statement, but rather a result variable


> Among other reasons, Fortran allows either call by reference
> or call by value result (sometimes called copy-in copy-out).
> In the latter case, INTENT(OUT) might not do the copy in.
> It can also affect the way the optimizer works.


I believe the optimizer could do much with the guarantee that a variable
will never be read.


Anyway, there are ways around this, of course. Just assign to a local
variable first, so you can use the value again.


--
Michiel Helvensteijn



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.