Re: Number of compiler passes

Denis Washington <dwashington@gmx.net>
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:39:03 +0200

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Number of compiler passes m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (Michiel) (2008-07-21)
Re: Number of compiler passes gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-07-21)
Re: Number of compiler passes gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-07-21)
Re: Number of compiler passes m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (Michiel) (2008-07-22)
Re: Number of compiler passes dwashington@gmx.net (Denis Washington) (2008-07-25)
Re: Number of compiler passes m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (Michiel) (2008-07-25)
Re: Number of compiler passes gneuner2/@/comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-07-25)
Re: Number of compiler passes m.helvensteijn@gmail.com (Michiel) (2008-07-26)
Re: Number of compiler passes gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-07-27)
Re: Number of compiler passes gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-07-28)
Re: Number of compiler passes gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2008-07-28)
[8 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Denis Washington <dwashington@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:39:03 +0200
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-07-041 08-07-044 08-07-048
Keywords: question
Posted-Date: 25 Jul 2008 13:03:28 EDT

On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 21:31 +0200, Michiel wrote:
> For now, functions in the source language cannot be passed, assigned or
> returned yet. But in the future I hope to include functional aspects into
> the language. I'm already planning for it in the design.
>
> Thanks for your reply,


Out of pure curiosity: what kind of language are you trying to develop?
What are you planning to do with it? That would interest me.


Regards,
Denis


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.