Related articles |
---|
State of the Art peter.deussen@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Peter) (2008-07-18) |
Re: State of the Art jaluber@gmail.com (Johannes) (2008-07-20) |
Re: State of the Art DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-07-21) |
Re: State of the Art peter.deussen@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Peter) (2008-07-21) |
Re: State of the Art parrt@cs.usfca.edu (Terence Parr) (2008-07-21) |
Re: State of the Art ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-07-23) |
Re: State of the Art cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-07-22) |
Re: State of the Art torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2008-07-23) |
Re: State of the Art ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2008-07-24) |
Re: State of the Art dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2008-07-25) |
Re: State of the Art johnhull2008@gmail.com (johnhull2008) (2008-07-28) |
[3 later articles] |
From: | Terence Parr <parrt@cs.usfca.edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:14:36 -0700 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Keywords: | parse, practice |
Posted-Date: | 21 Jul 2008 18:37:31 EDT |
> I'd prefer PEG, which also establishes a defined order for
ambiguous cases.
ANTLR does this too, but optimizes them to use backtracking only if
LL(*) fails. Turn on backtrack=true and ANTLR does PEG.
Regards,
Terence
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.