Re: State of the Art

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:31:39 +0200

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
State of the Art peter.deussen@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Peter) (2008-07-18)
Re: State of the Art jaluber@gmail.com (Johannes) (2008-07-20)
Re: State of the Art DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-07-21)
Re: State of the Art peter.deussen@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Peter) (2008-07-21)
Re: State of the Art parrt@cs.usfca.edu (Terence Parr) (2008-07-21)
Re: State of the Art ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-07-23)
Re: State of the Art cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-07-22)
Re: State of the Art torbenm@pc-003.diku.dk (2008-07-23)
Re: State of the Art ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2008-07-24)
[5 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:31:39 +0200
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-07-033 08-07-037
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 21 Jul 2008 07:56:48 EDT

Johannes schrieb:


> From my limited experience I'd say that one advancement is the LL(*)
> algorithm which allows arbitrary scan ahead of tokens (compared to
> e.g. LL(5) which allows only to check the next 5).


I'd prefer PEG, which also establishes a defined order for ambiguous cases.


DoDi


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.