Re: Compiler creation toolkit

"Bartc" <bc@freeuk.com>
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:03:06 GMT

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-11)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2008-06-11)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2008-06-11)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit rich@pennware.com (Richard Pennington) (2008-06-14)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-17)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-17)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit bc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2008-06-18)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit theresistor@gmail.com (2008-06-20)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-07-05)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-07-05)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Bartc" <bc@freeuk.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:03:06 GMT
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-06-018
Keywords: C, tools
Posted-Date: 21 Jun 2008 12:56:43 EDT

<scholz.lothar@gmail.com> wrote in message news:08-06-018@comp.compilers...
> My project is to create an eiffel like compiler.
> For the final optimized results i will generate c code, but i would
> like to use something else for faster updates in the edit-compile-run
> cycle.


I've found C compilers (even linkers) to be pretty fast now for reasonable
sized programs.


How slow would be your edit-compile-run cycle using C output? Or is the
bottleneck in your generation of C code?


What would be the output of your front-end anyway, if you don't use C?


--
Bartc


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.