Re: Compiler creation toolkit

Richard Pennington <rich@pennware.com>
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:59:38 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-09)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit kamalpr@hp.com (kamal) (2008-06-10)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-11)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2008-06-11)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2008-06-11)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit rich@pennware.com (Richard Pennington) (2008-06-14)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-17)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit scholz.lothar@gmail.com (2008-06-17)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit bc@freeuk.com (Bartc) (2008-06-18)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit theresistor@gmail.com (2008-06-20)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-07-05)
Re: Compiler creation toolkit ademakov@gmail.com (Aleksey Demakov) (2008-07-05)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Richard Pennington <rich@pennware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:59:38 -0500
Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/
References: 08-06-018 08-06-022
Keywords: tools, code
Posted-Date: 15 Jun 2008 15:12:19 EDT

scholz.lothar@gmail.com wrote:
> On 9 Jun., 21:29, scholz.lot...@gmail.com wrote:
>> My project is to create an eiffel like compiler.
>> For the final optimized results i will generate c code, but i would
>> like to use something else for faster updates in the edit-compile-run
>> cycle. ...


I'm having a hard time understanding why LLVM doesn't work for you. It
can look like a traditional code generator back end but you can also
JIT compile the LLVM bitcode, rather than generating assembly language
and linking it.


-Rich


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.