Re: Bootstraping compilers ?

Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:32:59 +0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Bootstraping compilers ? pocm@soton.ac.uk (2008-04-16)
Re: Bootstraping compilers ? chris@phaedsys.org (Chris Hills) (2008-04-18)
Re: Bootstraping compilers ? roland.leissa@googlemail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roland_Lei=DFa?=) (2008-04-18)
Re: Bootstraping compilers ? damian.thomas@unisys.com (Damian Thomas) (2008-04-18)
Re: Bootstraping compilers ? marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2008-04-18)
Re: Bootstraping compilers ? marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2008-04-18)
Re: Bootstraping compilers ? lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl) (2008-04-18)
Re: Bootstraping compilers ? cdb@nullstone.com (Christopher Glaeser) (2008-04-19)
Re: Bootstraping compilers ? torbenm@app-4.diku.dk (2008-04-21)
Re: Bootstraping compilers ? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-04-21)
Re: Bootstraping compilers ? pocm@soton.ac.uk (2008-04-22)
[4 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:32:59 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Stack Usenet News Service
References: 08-04-059 08-04-068
Keywords: debug, practice
Posted-Date: 18 Apr 2008 19:48:20 EDT

On 2008-04-18, Roland Lei_a <roland.leissa@googlemail.com> wrote:
> A compiler which can compile itself is definitely a nice feature, but
> this is surely not a must have. There are compilers out there which
> don't even understand their source language, i.e. a compiler for
> languages Foo and Bar but the compiler itself is written in C.
>
> But I would agree that a compiler written in Foo and understands Foo
> should be able to compile itself. This is a really nice test.


Depends on the completeness of the support of "Foo" of
course. Specially with ever widening scope of language specifications
of modern languages this is often harder than one would expect.


Similarly the use of non standard extensions in the compiler.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.