|Optimization order linuxkaffee_@_gmx.net (Stephan Ceram) (2008-04-17)|
|Re: Optimization order firstname.lastname@example.org (kphillips) (2008-04-18)|
|Re: Optimization order email@example.com (Derek M. Jones) (2008-04-18)|
|Re: Optimization order SidTouati@inria.fr (Sid Touati) (2008-04-22)|
|From:||"Derek M. Jones" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:58:11 GMT|
|Organization:||ntl Cablemodem News Service|
|Posted-Date:||18 Apr 2008 11:59:29 EDT|
> Do You Know Of Any Guidelines In Which Order Standard Compiler
> Optimizations Should Be Invoked Promising Best Run-Time Results?
> Probably, the order will vary from compiler to compiler due to
> different implementations of the optimizations, but still I can
> imagine that some types of optimizations might profit from other
> optimization classes that should be invoked before.
These days the bleeding edge of compiler optimization uses some form
of machine learning to select the best ordering for a given program.
A Google search using the terms:
compiler optimizing iterative
compiler optimizing machine learning
will find plenty of papers (sorry don't know the area well enough
to recommend a good survey paper).
That well know source of compiler optimization information ;-)
is silent on the topic.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.