Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Optimization order linuxkaffee_@_gmx.net (Stephan Ceram) (2008-04-17) |
| Re: Optimization order kevin.phillips83@yahoo.com (kphillips) (2008-04-18) |
| Re: Optimization order derek@knosof.co.uk (Derek M. Jones) (2008-04-18) |
| Re: Optimization order SidTouati@inria.fr (Sid Touati) (2008-04-22) |
| From: | "Derek M. Jones" <derek@knosof.co.uk> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:58:11 GMT |
| Organization: | ntl Cablemodem News Service |
| References: | 08-04-064 |
| Keywords: | optimize |
| Posted-Date: | 18 Apr 2008 11:59:29 EDT |
Stephan,
> Do You Know Of Any Guidelines In Which Order Standard Compiler
> Optimizations Should Be Invoked Promising Best Run-Time Results?
>
> Probably, the order will vary from compiler to compiler due to
> different implementations of the optimizations, but still I can
> imagine that some types of optimizations might profit from other
> optimization classes that should be invoked before.
These days the bleeding edge of compiler optimization uses some form
of machine learning to select the best ordering for a given program.
A Google search using the terms:
compiler optimizing iterative
compiler optimizing machine learning
will find plenty of papers (sorry don't know the area well enough
to recommend a good survey paper).
That well know source of compiler optimization information ;-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compiler_optimization
is silent on the topic.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.