Re: LRgen, was Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Parse++

"Paul B Mann" <paul@paulbmann.com>
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:35:38 -0600

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Re: Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Pars mjfs1@cam.ac.uk (Marcel Satchell) (2008-03-28)
Re: LRgen, was Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace paul@paulbmann.com (Paul B Mann) (2008-03-31)
Re: LRgen, was Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-04-01)
Popularity of compiler tools, was LRgen anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2008-04-06)
Re: Popularity of compiler tools, was LRgen joevans@gmail.com (Jason Evans) (2008-04-07)
Re: Popularity of compiler tools, was LRgen TegiriNenashi@gmail.com (Tegiri Nenashi) (2008-04-08)
Re: Popularity of compiler tools, was LRgen walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2008-04-11)
Re: Popularity of compiler tools, was LRgen DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2008-04-11)
[6 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Paul B Mann" <paul@paulbmann.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:35:38 -0600
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-03-107
Keywords: tools
Posted-Date: 31 Mar 2008 20:45:39 EDT

> Is it actually possible to download LRgen? LRgen.com always comes
> up as Not Found.


The current status for LRGen is:
"Not enough interest. No feedback. No money. Not worth my time".
That could change someday, but not likely.


If anyone has generated more interest in their product by making it
open source, let me know. Also let me know how to get money for
working on open source code. Thanks.


Paul B Mann


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.