Related articles |
---|
Prediction of local code modifications plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-03-27) |
Re: Prediction of local code modifications gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-03-28) |
Re: Prediction of local code modifications preston.briggs@gmail.com (preston.briggs@gmail.com) (2008-03-28) |
Re: Prediction of local code modifications max@gustavus.edu (Max Hailperin) (2008-03-28) |
Re: Prediction of local code modifications gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2008-03-29) |
Re: Prediction of local code modifications preston.briggs@gmail.com (preston.briggs@gmail.com) (2008-03-29) |
Re: Prediction of local code modifications plfriko@yahoo.de (Tim Frink) (2008-04-01) |
Re: Prediction of local code modifications preston.briggs@gmail.com (preston.briggs@gmail.com) (2008-04-01) |
Re: Prediction of local code modifications max@gustavus.edu (Max Hailperin) (2008-04-02) |
Re: Prediction of local code modifications cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2008-04-02) |
[10 later articles] |
From: | Max Hailperin <max@gustavus.edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:40:17 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 08-03-105 08-03-109 08-03-110 |
Keywords: | history |
Posted-Date: | 29 Mar 2008 13:46:19 EDT |
"preston.briggs@gmail.com" <preston.briggs@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mar 28, 3:44 am, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
>> Dynamic programming, ... First popularized by biologists comparing
>> protein sequences, it was then used by the unix 'diff' program...
>
> Biologists first? Naah.
I'll second that, but with a bit more by way of a reference. The
basic ideas of dynamic programming can actually be traced far back,
long before the name "dynamic programming" or the start of molecular
biology. But for the present purpose, it suffices to ask who gave it
recogized its importance sufficiently to give it the name "dynamic
programming," and when and why. For that, see Richard Bellman on the
Birth of Dynamic Programming, by Stuart Dreyfus,
http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~ami/cd/or50/1526-5463-2002-50-01-0048.pdf
The short version is that Richard Bellman named the technique at RAND
(a military think tank) in fall of 1950, choosing a name that "not
even a Congressman could object to." So far as I know, RAND was not
studying biology in 1950.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.