Re: Progress in instruction scheduling?

"=?UTF-8?B?IO+7i++7pO+6riDvuqnvu6vvu6Dvu67vu68=?=" <omerbeg@gmail.com>
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:54:17 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Progress in instruction scheduling? linuxkaffee@gmx.net (Stephan Ceram) (2008-03-17)
Re: Progress in instruction scheduling? omerbeg@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?IO+7i++7pO+6riDvuqnvu6vvu6Dvu67vu68=?=) (2008-03-18)
Re: Progress in instruction scheduling? boldyrev+nospam@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru (Ivan Boldyrev) (2008-03-19)
Re: Progress in instruction scheduling? SidTouati@inria.fr (Sid Touati) (2008-04-22)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "=?UTF-8?B?IO+7i++7pO+6riDvuqnvu6vvu6Dvu67vu68=?=" <omerbeg@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:54:17 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 08-03-068
Keywords: optimize
Posted-Date: 18 Mar 2008 23:35:32 EDT

There is some recent work on optimal scheduling which compares with
the list scheduling heuristic. The problem is that the list scheduler
is very close to optimal and much faster than the optimal one.


Abid M. Malik, Jim McInnes, and Peter van Beek. Optimal basic block
instruction scheduling for multiple-issue processors using constraint
programming. Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on
Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, 279-287,
November, 2006. A longer version appears in the International J. of AI
Tools, 17:37-54, 2008.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.