Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Parse++ d.parser@yahoo.com (2007-12-10) |
| Re: Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Pars cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2007-12-11) |
| Re: Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Pars DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-12-12) |
| Re: Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Pars tom@infoether.com (Tom Copeland) (2007-12-12) |
| Re: Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Pars gneuner2/@/comcast.net (George Neuner) (2007-12-13) |
| Re: Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Pars cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2007-12-15) |
| Re: Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Pars paul@paulbmann.com (Paul B Mann) (2008-02-14) |
| Re: Seeking recommendations for a Visual Parser to replace Visual Pars mjfs1@cam.ac.uk (Marcel Satchell) (2008-03-28) |
| From: | Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:46:33 -0500 |
| Organization: | Compilers Central |
| References: | 07-12-032 07-12-037 |
| Keywords: | parse |
| Posted-Date: | 12 Dec 2007 23:18:53 EST |
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 02:00 -0500, Chris F Clark wrote:
> JavaCC, a spin-off of ANTLR, with a very active community and some
> nice add-on tools (JTB and JJTREE). Unfortunately, I think it is
> Java only.
Correct - JavaCC only produces Java lexers/parsers at the moment.
Also, I'd recommend JJTree over JTB since JTB doesn't support all the
current JavaCC lexical constructs. For example, JTB can't handle token
definitions that contain repetition ranges, e.g.:
TOKEN : {
<THREE_HELLOS : ("hello"){3}>
}
Yours,
Tom
http://generatingparserswithjavacc.com/
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.