Related articles |
---|
How to generate object code mudgen@gmail.com (Nick Mudge) (2007-10-21) |
Re: How to generate object code santosh.k83@gmail.com (santosh) (2007-10-22) |
Re: How to generate object code gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2007-10-21) |
Re: How to generate object code eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2007-10-23) |
Re: How to generate object code cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2007-10-24) |
From: | glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:02:23 -0800 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 07-10-064 |
Keywords: | code |
Posted-Date: | 22 Oct 2007 00:24:26 EDT |
> Do compilers normally turn code into an assembly language and then
> run an assembler to to convert it into binary? Or does the compiler
> make its own representation and itself turn the representation into
> object code?
As John said, compilers come both ways. Ones that generate object
code directly usually have a way to generate human readable assembly
code that may or may not be assemblable. This is sometimes needed for
humans to understand what the compiler is doing.
-- glen
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.