Related articles |
---|
Perfecting State Elimination bjoern@hoehrmann.de (Bjoern Hoehrmann) (2007-10-01) |
Re: Perfecting State Elimination anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2007-10-01) |
Re: Perfecting State Elimination bjoern@hoehrmann.de (Bjoern Hoehrmann) (2007-10-01) |
From: | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:07:29 GMT |
Organization: | Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien |
References: | 07-10-006 |
Keywords: | DFA, lex, optimize |
Posted-Date: | 01 Oct 2007 12:07:54 EDT |
Bjoern Hoehrmann <bjoern@hoehrmann.de> writes:
> I am trying to find a method that will make regular expressions as
>short as possible (say, using only concatenation, alternation, zero or
>more repetition, characters and epsilon, I want to minimize the number
>of characters) given limited resources. I could not find much material
>on the problem on the web, except that I can turn the expression into
>a minimal DFA and the DFA into a regular expression using state elimi-
>nation, and that some removal sequences are better than others.
My feeling is that that approach is wrong, because a regexp
corresponds to an NFA, and a DFA can be much larger than an equivalent
NFA, so a regexp generated from the DFA is likely to be suboptimal,
unless the DFA->regexp step reintroduces nondeterminism.
- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.