Re: Vector assignment semantics (was Re: latest trends in compiler optimization research?)

"Tom Linden" <tom@kednos.company>
Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:35:56 -0700

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[12 earlier articles]
Re: Vector assignment semantics (was Re: latest trends in compiler opt Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com (Peter Flass) (2007-08-17)
Re: Vector assignment semantics (was Re: latest trends in compiler opt jjw@cs.sfu.ca (James J. Weinkam) (2007-08-20)
Re: Vector assignment semantics (was Re: latest trends in compiler opt gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2007-08-20)
Re: Vector assignment semantics (was Re: latest trends in compiler opt jvorbrueggen@mediasec.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Vorbr=FCggen?=) (2007-08-21)
Re: Vector assignment semantics (was Re: latest trends in compiler opt tom@kednos.company (Tom Linden) (2007-08-26)
Re: Vector assignment semantics (was Re: latest trends in compiler opt gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2007-08-29)
Re: Vector assignment semantics (was Re: latest trends in compiler opt tom@kednos.company (Tom Linden) (2007-09-11)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Tom Linden" <tom@kednos.company>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.lang.pl1
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:35:56 -0700
Organization: Kednos
References: 07-08-016 07-08-021 07-08-024 07-08-034 07-08-037 07-08-040 07-08-041 07-08-044 07-08-051 07-08-054 07-08-081 07-08-090
Keywords: PL/I, standards
Posted-Date: 13 Sep 2007 01:00:33 EDT

> [As far as I can tell, the 1976 ANSI PL/I standard says nothing at
> all about the order of evaluation of array expressions. But it's
> very hard to read and it's possible I missed something. -John]


That is correct, it is an implementation detail.


--
PL/I for OpenVMS
www.kednos.com


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.