Related articles |
---|
Production missing on page 9 of Compiler Construction pupeno@pupeno.com (pupeno@pupeno.com) (2007-08-31) |
Re: Production missing on page 9 of Compiler Construction DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-09-01) |
Re: Production missing on page 9 of Compiler Construction adrian.devries@t-online.de (Adrian Devries) (2007-09-02) |
Re: Production missing on page 9 of Compiler Construction torbenm@app-7.diku.dk (2007-09-03) |
From: | torbenm@app-7.diku.dk (Torben =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C6gidius?= Mogensen) |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | Mon, 03 Sep 2007 09:09:23 +0200 |
Organization: | Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen |
References: | 07-08-095 |
Keywords: | books, errors, parse, comment |
Posted-Date: | 03 Sep 2007 21:30:24 EDT |
"pupeno@pupeno.com" <pupeno@pupeno.com> writes:
> E = T | A "+" T.
> T = F | T "*" F.
> F = V | "(" E ")".
> V = "a" | "b" | "c" | "d".
>
> A is being used on the right hand side without it being defined on the
> left hand side first. What am I missing?
>
> The only thing I can think of is that it is missing a production at
> first, like:
>
> A = E
Alternatively, you can simply replace the "A" by an "E". It has the
same effect as adding A = E, but it doesn't make the grammar larger.
In all likelyhood, Wirth originally used A for the German/Swiss word
"Ausdruck" (meaning "Expression") and changed it to E for "Expression"
but missed a spot.
Torben
[Thanks also to several other people who sent in similar messages. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.