Related articles |
---|
[7 earlier articles] |
Re: latest trends in compiler optimization research? dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2007-08-01) |
Re: latest trends in compiler optimization research? onkar.n.m@gmail.com (onkar) (2007-08-03) |
Re: latest trends in compiler optimization research? al407@cam.ac.uk (Anton Lokhmotov) (2007-08-07) |
Re: latest trends in compiler optimization research? wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2007-08-07) |
Re: latest trends in compiler optimization research? wclodius@lanl.gov (2007-08-09) |
Re: latest trends in compiler optimization research? bmoses-nospam@cits1.stanford.edu (Brooks Moses) (2007-08-09) |
Re: latest trends in compiler optimization research? dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2007-08-08) |
Re: latest trends in compiler optimization research? srimks11@gmail.com (srimks11@gmail.com) (2007-08-11) |
Re: latest trends in compiler optimization research? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2007-08-11) |
From: | Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 08 Aug 2007 19:58:51 +0100 (BST) |
Organization: | dotat labs |
References: | 07-08-016 07-08-021 |
Keywords: | optimize, parallel, Fortran |
Posted-Date: | 10 Aug 2007 20:10:28 EDT |
SM Ryan <wyrmwif@tsoft.org> wrote:
>
>I lost track of Fortran before 90 was standarised, but the array
>notation of 8X was seriously broken: while theoretically letting
>programmers express themselves at a high level, it forced serial
>semantics whether the programmer intended that or no; thus the
>notation could not be vectorised or parallelised any easier than if
>explicit do loops had been used.
There was an interesting paper about High Performance Fortran presented
at the recent HOPL III conference. HPF adds parrallelization pragmas to
Fortran 90.
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1238844.1238851
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.