|ML1 Compiler Update: 7/11/07 email@example.com (Steven Nichols) (2007-07-11)|
|Re: ML1 Compiler Update: 7/11/07 firstname.lastname@example.org (Aaron Gray) (2007-07-13)|
|Re: ML1 Compiler Update: 7/11/07 email@example.com (Steven Nichols) (2007-07-16)|
|From:||Steven Nichols <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC)|
|Organization:||Silicon Valley Public Access Link|
|Posted-Date:||18 Jul 2007 20:03:39 EDT|
In comp.compilers Aaron Gray <email@example.com> wrote:
> "Steven Nichols" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
>> Let me know what you think
> Port it to Unix and Windows, you may have a realisticly large audiance then.
> I would not contimplate using DOS these days, and hence would not bother
> looking at ML1..
> [I'd have to agree. 16 bit DOS has been dead for a decade other than
> in tiny embedded niche applications. -John]
ML1 runs on DOS but will compile for just about anything. I have used it
to compile for Linux using DOSEMU and FREEDOS. Eventually (time
permitting) I will port the executable to Linux. One adavntage to DOS
is that the compiler executable can be run on the greatest number of
systems; Windows, Linux and DOS, as-is.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.