Re: ML1 Compiler Update: 7/11/07

Steven Nichols <sdn@svpal.org>
Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
ML1 Compiler Update: 7/11/07 sdn@svpal.org (Steven Nichols) (2007-07-11)
Re: ML1 Compiler Update: 7/11/07 ang.usenet@gmail.com (Aaron Gray) (2007-07-13)
Re: ML1 Compiler Update: 7/11/07 sdn@svpal.org (Steven Nichols) (2007-07-16)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Steven Nichols <sdn@svpal.org>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers,comp.lang.misc,comp.programming
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Silicon Valley Public Access Link
References: 07-07-043 07-07-047
Keywords: MSDOS
Posted-Date: 18 Jul 2007 20:03:39 EDT

In comp.compilers Aaron Gray <ang.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Steven Nichols" <sdn@svpal.org> wrote in message
>> Let me know what you think
>
> Port it to Unix and Windows, you may have a realisticly large audiance then.
> I would not contimplate using DOS these days, and hence would not bother
> looking at ML1..
>
> Aaron
> [I'd have to agree. 16 bit DOS has been dead for a decade other than
> in tiny embedded niche applications. -John]


ML1 runs on DOS but will compile for just about anything. I have used it
to compile for Linux using DOSEMU and FREEDOS. Eventually (time
permitting) I will port the executable to Linux. One adavntage to DOS
is that the compiler executable can be run on the greatest number of
systems; Windows, Linux and DOS, as-is.


Steve


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.